Re: [liberty-dev] ID-SIS-* Namespace name inconsistencies


To sensen@vell.com
From John Kemp <john.kemp@earthlink.net>
Date Fri, 24 Oct 2003 15:17:10 -0400
Cc liberty-dev@emailprotection.org
In-reply-to <sf990dc2.092@prv-mail20.provo.novell.com >
Reply-to liberty-dev@emailprotection.org
Sender liberty-dev-owner@emailprotection.org

Stuart,

I'm not seeing this issue with the drafts that I am reading, in which the XSD and WSDL also refer to urn:liberty:id-sis-pp:2003-08. However, the specification document itself is normative, and so, the correct namespace URN should be in all cases urn:liberty:id-sis-pp:2003-08 ( or for the ID-SIS-EP, urn:liberty:id-sis-ep:2003-08).

Did you download the XSD and WSDL from the public site, or from the LAP members area?

Thanks,

- JohnK

______________________________________
John Kemp      john.kemp@earthlink.net
t: 413.458.9053        f: 413.458.0951
Co-ordinating editor / Project Liberty

On Friday, Oct 24, 2003, at 13:32 US/Eastern, Stuart Jensen wrote:

The latest publication of the Liberty Specs for ID-SIS-PP and ID-SIS-EP show a new name for their respective xml namespaces

urn:liberty:id-sis-pp:2003-08
urn:liberty:id-sis-ep:2003-08

The old names were

urn:liberty:idpp:2003-08
urn:liberty:eip:2003-08

The wsdl files and xsd files still contain the old names. So, what name is it to be?  Do the wsdl and xsd files just still need to be updated with the new name?

Stuart Jensen
sjensen@novell.com
-----------------------------------

If you would like to unsubscribe from this list, please click on the URL 
below:
https://www.projectliberty.org/member/unsubscribe/

The Liberty Alliance liberty-dev mail list archive can be viewed at the following URL:

https://www.projectliberty.org/devforum/maillist/liberty-dev/maillist.html


Partial thread listing:

10/24/2003
Re: [liberty-dev] ID-SIS-* Namespace name inconsistencies(continued)
 John Kemp (10/24/2003)
 sampo (10/24/2003)
10/23/2003
[liberty-dev] ResourceID Question
(Stuart Jensen)
 Conor P. Cahill (10/24/2003)
 Jonathan Sergent (10/24/2003)

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here