Re: [[liberty-dev] Liberty Alliance Question]


To <liberty-dev@dualdiagnosis.org>
From IGOR IVANOV <igorivanov@usa.net>
Date Tue, 02 Sep 2003 13:20:59 -0400
Reply-to liberty-dev@dualdiagnosis.org
Sender liberty-dev-owner@dualdiagnosis.org

wrong address..

<Patrick.Leuthold@team.bluewin.com> wrote:


After reading the Liberty Alliance Specification I have a question about
the example in the ID-FF Overview document. 
How can the service provider determine, when a principal visits his
website, either to initiate a single sign - on and federation profile or
to promt the principal to do a login on his local account, without any
interaction from the principal.
I suppose that the introduction profile is not a adequate means, because
the cookie is in both case the same. Is this decision out of the
standard? 
Best regards

Patrick

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

If you would like to unsubscribe from this list, please click on the URL 
below:
https://www.projectliberty.org/member/unsubscribe/

Partial thread listing:

09/02/2003
Re: [[liberty-dev] Liberty Alliance Question](IGOR IVANOV)
09/02/2003
[liberty-dev] Liberty Alliance Question
(Patrick.Leuthold)
 Conor P. Cahill (09/02/2003)
02/12/2003
[liberty-dev] Difference between 1.0 and 1.1?(taesung)
02/07/2003
[liberty-dev] Liberty Alliance Announces Whitepaper
(Liberty Alliance Admin)

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here